From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:28:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE5E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:28:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (rooster.chubbo.net [168.75.98.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE73E43D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j070SbR5030054; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j070SbLR030053; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) X-Authentication-Warning: rooster.chubbo.net: nobody set sender to freebsd-questions@chubbo.net using -f Received: from c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net (c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net [67.169.93.71]) by mail.chubbo.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 Message-ID: <1105057717.41ddd7b57ac30@mail.chubbo.net> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 From: joseph kacmarcik To: Jev References: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> In-Reply-To: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nic aggregation/teaming (AFT or similar) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:28:53 -0000 > Has there been any developments with this? We are using AFT with dual > intel nics for switch redundancy on Linux boxes. I really want to try > and move to FreeBSD, and this is the only major issue that I can see. if you're looking for single-path redundancy and not increased throughput, you could use CARP (patches are here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/CARP/). the patches apply cleanly to 5.x, and seem to work just fine. if you need more information, check the list archives. good luck! joe