Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:53:18 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: Al Johnson <aj305523@tampabay.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Top posting Message-ID: <20040320195318.GA923@alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <20040319223506.GA63254@bhunter.net> References: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k> <20040319174618.GH64130@keyslapper.org> <20040319223506.GA63254@bhunter.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So far I only see argument agains top-posting. If it makes sense for you, perhaps you could give a couple of arguments wy you think its a good idee. On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:35:06PM -0500, Al Johnson wrote: > I'm with you... Top-posting makes the most sense for me. I doubt it. > I was born to top-post. It would make sence if you have a mailer that handels threads and you are accully following the whole thread. On second thougth: in this case you could just as easly delete the whole mail. You don't read it any how. It doesn't make sence for ppl who don't have a mailer with thread capabilty or don't read the whole thread. > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:28:24PM -0800, Charles McManis wrote: > > Perhaps it isn't "logical", if you've read all the email then the quoted > > thread is just reference anyway. This is the "new stuff". I love being able > > to read mail in the preview-pane vs "next message" , jump to the bottom, > > "next message" jump to the bottom. > > > > It comes down to opinion I think How much sence did this make? -- Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040320195318.GA923>