From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 12:52:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570B716A4C1 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aristotle.tamu.edu (Aristotle.tamu.edu [165.91.161.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4383F43F75 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:52:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rasmith@aristotle.tamu.edu) Received: from aristotle.tamu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aristotle.tamu.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8HJqmcZ082311 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:52:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rasmith@aristotle.tamu.edu) Message-Id: <200309171952.h8HJqmcZ082311@aristotle.tamu.edu> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Dillon <200309171936.h8HJa2K5012289@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:52:48 -0500 From: Robin Smith Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:12.openssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 19:52:53 -0000 >>>>> "Jacques" == Jacques A Vidrine writes: Jacques> I think we'll just not do it quite completely and go with Jacques> # kill `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` # /usr/sbin/sshd Doesn't sshd respond to a HUP by re-executing itself rather than simply re-reading its config files? That is, wouldn't "kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` " do what's wanted (i.e. kill and restart the listening daemon while leaving the children for established connections alone)?