From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec 17 07:32:49 1996
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA29559
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:32:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA29554
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:32:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA08919; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:31:15 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:31:15 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199612171531.IAA08919@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users), nate@mt.sri.com
Subject: Re: libc_r broken in 2.2
In-Reply-To: <199612170939.KAA15004@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <199612162346.QAA05267@rocky.mt.sri.com>
	<199612170939.KAA15004@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > This also requires backing out the 1.6 revision of include/time.h as
> > well.
> 
> This change looked ``too much like a bug fix'' to me, that's why i've
> pulled it, along with the function change itself.

Oh, I agree it's a bugfix, but it's a non-trivial bug fix.  Jeff would
know all of the affected files.

> Curious, why used libc_r to have differing return types for them?

POSIX apparently changed the return types.


Nate