From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 00:13:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DACA37B401 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1880C43F75 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:13:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h557DbuD071736; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:13:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h557DbgH071735; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:13:37 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h5570tHh011399; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:00:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200306050700.h5570tHh011399@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:38:39 -0300." <3EDE74EF.6060507@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:00:55 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 07:13:40 -0000 "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > Mark Murray wrote: > > > > The downside is that base telnet will depend on src/crypto/telnet, > > so folks in dodgy countries which don't allow them to have crypto > > source will not be able to do telnet development, and they will > > not get a "fresh" telnet[d] after a make world. > > > > Comments? I'm keen to go on this. > > Err... what do you expect the people in countries that don't allow them > to have crypto to use? ssh? The number of countries on this list is very small. Those countries can still get a binary telnet. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH