From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 07:38:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9F0106566C; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01D98FC1E; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 575BE4AC42; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:38:04 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:38:02 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <375260633.20110412113802@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> References: <116932102.20110411113412@serebryakov.spb.ru> <924400541.20110411125319@serebryakov.spb.ru> <8ADBCF69-67AB-4E39-99D0-9971E942F1FA@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does somebody work on NanoBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:38:07 -0000 Hello, Warner. You wrote 11 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 18:32:24: > I also think that FreeNAS has its own script, which I though had been mer= ged to head. It seems, every NanoBSD-based project (FreeNAS, BSDRP, maybe other) has "home-brew" patches to nanobsd.sh and some support scripts, which, IMHO, worth to evaluate and, may be, integrate to "official" NanoBSD. Also, here is attempt to re-write NanoBSD in more clean and modular way (to be honest, nanobsd.sh code is not an example of clean & good shell code, compare to rc.d infrastructure, for example): http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/NanoBSD_NG P.S. I get these messages with my AND list addresses in To/CC: only once, as "personal" ones, is it Ok? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov