Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:57:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: riscv@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 272759] [lang/gcc12] only for arches not including riscv (blocks 310 packages on my list) Message-ID: <bug-272759-40250-aKGWpMHUMD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-272759-40250@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-272759-40250@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272759 --- Comment #4 from Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org> --- If you follow it back, normally on FreeBSD we (confusingly) use fpu-glibc.h= for cpu-target.h, but that requires feenableexcept to exist. However, riscv64 h= as feenableexcept as a static inline function in its fenv.h, and GCC's configu= re scripts aren't prepared for that, so they think it doesn't exist, fall back= on fpu-sysv.h and then the build dies because riscv64 (like every non-x86 architecture) doesn't implement either of fp(re)setsticky. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-272759-40250-aKGWpMHUMD>