From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 9 2:57:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5911715162 for ; Sun, 9 May 1999 02:57:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id SAA11417; Sun, 9 May 1999 18:56:31 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37355B45.6F9B43B5@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 18:54:13 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tetragon@cyber.com.au Cc: Tom , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS question.. References: <373544F8.2CA1CFBD@bitey.cyber.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gavan McCormack wrote: > > > > I have been hearing around that NFSv3 is the only 'good' NFS, and so far no > > > free Unixen have v3 implemented yet. I guess we will just have to wait.. :/ > > This isn't right either. FreeBSD has had NFSv3 for quite some time. It > > just needs more testing. > > I assume you mean in -CURRENT? This is the -STABLE list remember. :) Still, Wrong. AFAIK, even 2.2.x has nfsv3. But only in 3.x the default became nfsv3 instead of v2. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness is that _none_ of his predictions have come true yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message