From owner-cvs-all Mon Nov 29 10:23:32 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113415371; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 10:23:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 441BA1C4F; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 12:24:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A2E3836; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 12:24:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 12:24:20 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Peter Wemm Cc: Warner Losh , Bruce Evans , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_exit.c kern_synch.c src/sys/sys proc.h In-Reply-To: <19991129055252.65D5E1C6D@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > *This* is why we have such "hands off" policies for src/contrib and other > things that track the vendor releases. This is why "typo fixes" in man > pages and spelling "corrections" are so strongly discouraged for vendor > code. It's all coming clear to me now.. :> I always thought the small nits were discouraged because of conflicts, but that's another reason not to make them. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message