From owner-freebsd-security Sun Sep 5 19:40:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.actrix.gen.nz (mail2.actrix.gen.nz [203.96.16.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11ED1583A for ; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 19:40:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@xtra.co.nz) Received: from actrix.gen.nz (www@lemuria.actrix.gen.nz [203.96.16.20]) by mail.actrix.gen.nz (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA29804; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:38:49 +1200 (NZST) From: "Dan Langille" Reply-To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz To: Warner Losh , spork , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:38:49 nzst Subject: Re: Security Alerts X-Mailer: DMailWeb Web to Mail Gateway 2.1t, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm Message-id: <37d32939.64a9.0@actrix.gen.nz> X-User-Info: 202.37.52.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Warner Losh wrote: >In message <199909032020.PAA24920@metis.host4u.net> "Dan Langille" writes: >: Just do it. The good thing about services such as the one you are >: proposing is that it doesn't need anyone's "approval". If you think it's a >: good idea, do it. People will use it. [If a place can't be found within the >: FreeBSD pages, then I'll be quite happy to publish them on The >: FreeBSD Diary.] > >Wrong. If it relates to Security and a FreeBSD stamp of approval, it >needs my stamp of approval. Fair enough. I wasn't considering any aspect of "official" whatsoever. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message