From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 4 04:21:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29393512; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05266372; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id r344KqKl061350; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:20:52 GMT (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from [192.168.2.123] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id cq34rmtpbgxmq52bqr99pzgtjw; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 04:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Subject: Re: RFC: "Crochet" build tool Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <515ADB81.7090908@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 21:20:52 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5DFA61DB-70E4-4C3D-ACA0-995A175706C8@neville-neil.com> <5151B454.9090402@ceetonetechnology.com> <1CBF1416-3237-4DCE-8D61-7E998265C887@neville-neil.com> <1364311809.36972.27.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5151D045.80305@thieprojects.ch> <5151D9DB.7050001@thieprojects.ch> <167CF57D-01E3-4857-BF0E-C40B00FED226@netgate.com> <515ADB81.7090908@freebsd.org> To: Nathan Whitehorn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 04:21:00 -0000 On Apr 2, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 03/26/13 14:38, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> NanoBSD isn't specifically x86 only. >>=20 >> The startup script stuff is x86 only. >>=20 >> The build/installworld part of nanobsd can be refactored out and made >> platform portable. >>=20 >> The UFS image building part can be refactored out and made platform = portable. >>=20 >> The startup script stuff can be refactored out and made platform = portable. >>=20 >> The disk image stuff can be refactored out and made platform = portable. >>=20 >> These aren't unsolvable problems. :-) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > It's probably worth noting here that release(7) can do cross-builds, > including disk image generation, with no problem. If that's the part > you're looking at, it's already solved. > -Nathan What boot support does it install? Tim