From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 28 11:18:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6994616A4CE
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo2.RCousins.com (colo2.rcousins.com [198.144.196.52])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C547243F85
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:18:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rec@RCousins.com)
Received: from RCousins.com (unknown [10.0.2.5])
	by colo2.RCousins.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C70117043
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:18:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3F9EC10E.70403@RCousins.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:18:38 -0800
From: Robert Cousins <rec@RCousins.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Timing of Amd64 & FreeBSD 5.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:18:30 -0000

Does anyone have a good estimate of when 5.2 will be released?
Checking the Todo list shows that things are still a goodly ways off.

Also, at the fast rate at which AMD64 is maturing, how long before
it will be essentially as feature rich and port rich as i386?