Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 18:40:16 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: dannyman <dannyman@dannyland.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <4.1.19990302183847.00a22f00@localhost> In-Reply-To: <19990302192729.D15210@stumpy.dannyland.org> References: <4.1.19990302181700.00c56d10@localhost> <4.1.19990302161355.00ad66b0@localhost> <4.1.19990302154522.03fb3730@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903021551210.19678-100000@peloton.physics.m <4.1.19990302161355.00ad66b0@localhost> <19990302184424.C15210@stumpy.dannyland.org> <4.1.19990302181700.00c56d10@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:27 PM 3/2/99 -0600, dannyman wrote: >Uhhhh, no ... if you try to install something for 2.2.8, you're not going to >get any ELFs. That's why we have -RELEASE versions. True. But since the newest versions of the ports are all in ELF format, what you'll get will be old. Again, there ought to be a way to get the most up-to-date ports for any RELEASE version that's up to a year old. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990302183847.00a22f00>