From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 22 07:24:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2876A106566C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from john@theusgroup.com)
Received: from theusgroup.com (theusgroup.com [64.122.243.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D368FC14
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:24:28 +0000 (UTC)
To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAN6yY1tKYbTjgQsL1gnfrc9r68c+QDCb1SAb+M=RFA90jvLpnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+D9Qhv5EmrkqvLetx9T5WD_1BRuCpUyZ=VYnRSjwRYqA7phdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120321000058.177F8256@server.theusgroup.com>
	<CA+D9QhsMMXYbLKg__jZx=7KbCHtK6LjqkfL9WSWs=pdT-t9r0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN6yY1tKYbTjgQsL1gnfrc9r68c+QDCb1SAb+M=RFA90jvLpnw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:32:47 -0700."
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:24:22 -0700
From: John <john@theusgroup.com>
Message-Id: <20120322072422.5F4DD2B5@server.theusgroup.com>
Cc: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: powerd and increase in energy need
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:24:29 -0000

>
>If you are trying to reduce power consumption, why are you limiting Cx
>states to C2 (which save little) and not C3 (which will save a LOT of
>power when the CPU is not heavily loaded).

With my hardware, i5-650, using C3 does not result in lower power consumption
versus C2.  Both states draw exactly the same power.

hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C3
dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C3
dev.cpu.1.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest: C3
dev.cpu.2.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.2.cx_lowest: C3
dev.cpu.3.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.3.cx_lowest: C3
71w idle power

hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C2
dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C2
dev.cpu.1.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest: C2
dev.cpu.2.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.2.cx_lowest: C2
dev.cpu.3.cx_supported: C1/3 C2/205 C3/245
dev.cpu.3.cx_lowest: C2
71w idle power

John Theus
TheUs Group
TheUsGroup.com