From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Dec  7 16:32:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B5C5837B416; Fri,  7 Dec 2001 16:32:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB80b8304059;
	Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:37:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200112080037.fB80b8304059@mass.dis.org>
To: Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, arch@freebsd.org,
	net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable. 
In-Reply-To: Message from Marko Zec <zec@tel.fer.hr> 
   of "Fri, 07 Dec 2001 21:44:04 +0100." <3C112A14.21F08D50@tel.fer.hr> 
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:37:08 -0800
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> > > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs
> > > ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the
...
> > Yes; this is an excellent example of how it can be done better.
> 
> Sorry guys, but aren't you comparing apples with oranges? As far as I

No.  The issue at hand is procedure, not functionality.

ALTQ is maintained and developed in a fashion consistent with the Project's
general procedures and preferences.  Luigi's code commit was not.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message