From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 17 05:15:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246AA16A509 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 05:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: from ox.eicat.ca (ox.eicat.ca [66.96.30.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF8843D69 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 05:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by ox.eicat.ca (Postfix, from userid 66) id 640D41FFD0; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:15:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 077384AC2B; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:15:25 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17635.64364.933948.598366@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:15:24 -0400 To: Yann Berthier In-Reply-To: <20060816213736.GB1641@bashibuzuk.net> References: <17634.24534.923726.9912@canoe.dclg.ca> <20060816213736.GB1641@bashibuzuk.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, David Gilbert Subject: Re: openospfd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 05:15:26 -0000 >>>>> "Yann" == Yann Berthier writes: Yann> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, at 19:59, David Gilbert wrote: >> Is there anyone actively working on openospfd (the port)? Yann> I ended up taking a snapshot of openospf at that time and Yann> removing all route labels reference to compile it. It was Yann> running fine, except that we decided to go for static routes due Yann> to routes through an interface deleted as it should upon a link Yann> down event, but not reinstalled upon a following link up, with Yann> the routing table still insisting on using another interface Yann> when the directly connected one was now available. Certainly ? Yann> it was my hack's fault being too intrusive, but we where not Yann> comfortable with this situation ... Yann> Not too much of a problem for the number of routes considered Yann> in this part of the infrastructure but still ... Could I possibly have a copy of what you used? It may turn out to be useful to me. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================