Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:35:19 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: Bill Tillman <btillman99@yahoo.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW Firewall NAT inbound port-redirect Message-ID: <CAHu1Y73-M7Ds=zNUDDJboh7_eEPT-uiL6qULBghFJK__NiFKzQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110712160304.GI6611@dan.emsphone.com> References: <CAHu1Y70Uq1AkMF--rB8sAw2M1NW8a0x1H9voTPsy3cm5vQ6O2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20110711170729.GG6611@dan.emsphone.com> <1310473165.58370.YahooMailRC@web36501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <CAHu1Y725TGa8D=TQCKa7VQYDVAFLoABdFOZ%2BJwnMOBck0gWzyA@mail.gmail.com> <20110712160304.GI6611@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We're not talking about natd. The question was about the use of ipfirewall= nat. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> wrote= : > In the last episode (Jul 12), Michael Sierchio said: >> Is there a way of specifying a particular public address if there is >> more than one bound to the external interface? =A0A la >> >> nat 123 config if re0.2 log same_ports redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.3:22 102= .10.22.1:2222 > > Yes; the redirect_port syntax is described in the natd manpage: > > =A0 =A0 redirect_port proto targetIP:targetPORT[-targetPORT] > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [aliasIP:]aliasPORT[-aliasPORT] > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [remoteIP[:remotePORT[-remotePORT]]] > > > > -- > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Dan Nelson > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y73-M7Ds=zNUDDJboh7_eEPT-uiL6qULBghFJK__NiFKzQ>