Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:19:10 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Se=E1n_C=2E_Farley?= <sean-freebsd@farley.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setenv/unsetenv's known memory leak Message-ID: <86ekf65ssx.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20050223140733.T35108@thor.farley.org> 19:09:01 -0600 (CST)") References: <20050222173013.B26342@thor.farley.org> <863bvnmyrt.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050223140733.T35108@thor.farley.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Se=E1n C. Farley <sean-freebsd@farley.org> writes: > How does this version look? Needlessly complicated. I'd just copy the entire environment into malloc()ed space the first time setenv() or putenv() is called. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ekf65ssx.fsf>