From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 6 22:14:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6400E9D8 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 22:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [31.223.170.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 215D3935 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 22:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DDF16A402 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:14:14 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from smtp.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qJJwTTDy3qEU; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:14:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.9] (vaio [192.168.10.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB54D16A401 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:14:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54837FAC.801@digiware.nl> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 23:14:04 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: missing /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 22:14:24 -0000 Hi, Still trying to upgrade from 9.3 to 10.1, which seemed to get going. Completely started over again with cleaned out /etc/{make.src}.conf. Then build/installed 9.3 again which also included clang this time. but building the toolchain generates: -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 2.3: build tools -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src10; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj INSTALL="sh /usr/src10/tools/install.sh" PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin WORLDTMP=/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp VERSION="FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE amd64 1001503" MAKEFLAGS="-m /usr/src10/tools/build/mk -m /usr/src10/share/mk" COMPILER_TYPE=gcc /usr/obj/usr/src10/make.amd64/bmake -f Makefile.inc1 TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 DESTDIR= BOOTSTRAPPING=903506 SSP_CFLAGS= -DNO_LINT -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS -DNO_WARNS -DNO_CTF -DEARLY_BUILD -DNO_TESTS build-tools ===> bin/csh (obj,build-tools) grep 'ERR_' /usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.err.c | grep '^#define' >> sh.err.h cc -E -O2 -pipe -I. -I/usr/src10/bin/csh -I/usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -std=gnu99 -I/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/usr/include /usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c /usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.char.h /usr/src10/bin/csh/config.h /usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/config_f.h /usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.types.h sh.err.h -D_h_tc_const | grep 'Char STR' | sed -e 's/Char \([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\(.*\)/extern Char \1[];/' | sort >> tc.const.h cc -o gethost -L/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/usr/lib -O2 -pipe -I. -I/usr/src10/bin/csh -I/usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -std=gnu99 -I/usr/obj/usr/src10/tmp/legacy/usr/include /usr/src10/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a *** Error code 1 ----------------- Now I can fudge around this, by getting this lib from another 10.x system, but changes are that things are nog 100% compatible. So how do I get this lib first, before starting to build bin/csh. The other question is: why am I still using gcc for the toolchain even since I now have clang onboard? THanx, --WjW