From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Aug 18 15:51:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AAA14EA3 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:51:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA61789; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908182250.PAA61789@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Chris Piazza Subject: Re: bin/13236: Patch for whois to use UK Nominet database. Reply-To: Chris Piazza Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/13236; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Piazza To: joe@FreeBSD.org.uk Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/13236: Patch for whois to use UK Nominet database. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:45:06 -0700 On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 10:56:56PM +0100, joe@FreeBSD.org.uk wrote: > > It would be nice if whois was able to query the UK > Nominet whois database. Patches below ;) Which brings up a question: do we really need more? We can either disallow more and just say 'use -h blah' or add a zillion of them (CDNNNET(canada)..heck even NetNames Polska!). What do you think? -Chris -- cpiazza@home.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org "It's better to be quotable than to be honest." --Tom Stoppard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message