Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 01:34:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> To: FreeBSD ISP list <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Courier from ports without FAM? or securing FAM. Message-ID: <20051016012931.J90964@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Got courier working, however it keeps getting built with FAM even though I
told the port not to use it.
Looking at the makefile I saw
.if defined(WITH_FAM) || exists(${LOCALBASE}/lib/libfam.so)
CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"
LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib
LIB_DEPENDS+= fam.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/fam
.endif
So I commented them all out.. still built with FAM. :-(
Unforntunately I had FAM already installed and it seems the port compiles
against it if present.. even after commenting the lines above.
If it will be easier to keep it then I would like to secure it.
Could not find on the archives what would be the best way to keep
FAM/portmaper (which seems is needed for FAM) secure.
Anyone familiar with Courier could comment on how usefull is FAM for
users? Is it worth the trouble/security risk?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051016012931.J90964>