Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 07:32:42 -0800 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com> Cc: "'Doug Barton'" <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG>, "'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list'" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: daemon() Message-ID: <200011081532.HAA14728@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011081700430.60710-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011081700430.60710-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 8, 5:06pm, Max Khon wrote: } Subject: RE: daemon() } hi, there! } } On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Koster, K.J. wrote: } } > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything } > > anymore. } } > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should } > be nuked, IMHO. } } people still use it because it is smaller } obrien has already tried to remove it once (in Mar 1999) } } as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it. } my question was about unclosed pipe It appears to be a descriptor that your shell failed to close before execing your test program. Unless you do something out of the ordinary like run program 27>somefile the shell should only leave three descriptors (0, 1, and 2 for stdin, stdout, and stderr) open when it execs another program. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011081532.HAA14728>