From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 14 6:56:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from sp-1.swe.sonera.net (sp-1.swe.sonera.net [195.84.251.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E7137B66C for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 06:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [194.251.206.4] ([194.251.206.4]:31757 "HELO mail") by sp-1.swe.sonera.net with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:56:14 +0200 From: Per_Hallstrom_NV98ATe@teknikum.vaxjo.se (Per =?iso-8859-1?q?Hallstr=F6m?= NV98ATe) To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:00:38 +0200 Subject: load average, to small to be true.. Message-ID: Organization: Kungsmadskolan Vaxjo SWEDEN MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: X-Gateway: NASTA Gate 2.0 for FirstClass(R) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems I'm the only one that has discovered that FreeBSD (i have tried up to 4.1-RELEASE) dosen't want the load to be more than 1024, or maybe the only one that thinks it's annoying.. =) Why? I know FreeBSD can run more processes than that - I have tried with about 7000, running at the same time... too bad I can't see an impressive load average... It can't be that much extra work for the kernel to hold just some extra bits to support load averages that is far beyond reality, can it? /Per H To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message