From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 26 12:58:42 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C247106567F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3442513C46B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:58:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from dhcp250-210.yandex.ru ([87.250.250.210])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1JTzSN-0007Q0-KW; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:02:51 +0300
Message-ID: <47C40D01.3000601@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:58:41 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James <james@hicag.org>
References: <abd3d3c20802200732y12ef24dbw88bccf5814db5fdd@mail.gmail.com>
	<abd3d3c20802221023m439fbf51n226b93bd4153fa5b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <abd3d3c20802221023m439fbf51n226b93bd4153fa5b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Portupgrade not running get_notinstalled_depends (2.4.3_1,	2
 vs 2.4.3_2, 2)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:58:42 -0000

James wrote:
> 
>     If anyone considers this a bug I'd be happy to help work on a
>     correction.  Heck I may do it anyhow.

Sure, it's a bug.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.