From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  4 17:28:40 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9985106566B
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Feb 2011 17:28:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk
	[IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C388FC21
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Feb 2011 17:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EC2E7598;
	Fri,  4 Feb 2011 17:28:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from
	:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=NGy9NO3zzlR5
	J2xwTCwEVA6tzI4=; b=hLGJmQ+60zuOE7rWsKLqdpHJibRp3ik/dQVVmEKxNjbj
	LNlCes5hgrDJP6/PB0QWWcIIUNiHB48Et70TnjqHiB9IfR7j3WtnB+wtdAMrCDe/
	Xc9rIWA3msRkvX4wie5ouyhlBnDRE1jAhJ1//TdkizKtPAmVbOGfEb4RlL8kxN8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to
	:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=HWETTj
	DWE8aHGHimPmWmcqH3ZPxjKENbvVnrS1a3G96zHzo2CAvXc08ix9190K4CK338yV
	AD6bqSzg4uQlVxIy/9LqQaSlx78f1mvUMjWZmIWlmo8AXWybhaHTacw/qkw2xm5x
	cZF29iobFpuIES6lT/D25pP0K8y01rDflsBng=
Received: from unknown (client-86-23-50-224.brhm.adsl.virginmedia.com
	[86.23.50.224])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 331B2E7594;
	Fri,  4 Feb 2011 17:28:38 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:28:22 +0000
From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110204172822.00006149@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikY15zS7YvfNfRB0unb2qYaHkyQp__YJ7_b8nUa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikY15zS7YvfNfRB0unb2qYaHkyQp__YJ7_b8nUa@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8cvs9 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: geom_sched and ZFS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:28:40 -0000

On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:40:03 -0800
Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just curious if anyone has played around with geom_sched underneath
> ZFS, and found it to be extremely worthwhile, or not worth the bother,
> or if if it should be avoided altogether.

ZFS has its own I/O scheduler so shouldn't have any use for geom_sched.
See http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Performance for
details.

-- 
Bruce Cran