From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 17:43:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A965416A422 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:43:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2469243D7C for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:43:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1KHh94f007703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:43:13 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1KHgpR8035606; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:42:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1KHgpiO035605; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:42:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:42:50 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Divacky Roman Message-ID: <20060220174250.GA35343@flame.pc> References: <20060220172730.GA61906@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060220172730.GA61906@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.359, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDFLAGS setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:43:43 -0000 On 2006-02-20 18:27, Divacky Roman wrote: > hi > > is is possible to set global LDFLAGS as its possible with CFLAGS? Yes, but why would you want to do this? It is very likely to create dependencies with libraries that are not really used by all programs.