Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:34:45 -0500 From: "Russell Dickson" <birdcarry@webwingsnet.com> To: "Dan Nelson" <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: resources using mhash Message-ID: <200401102334450596.3BE9BC53@outgoing.verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040111035924.GC3393@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200401101826460595.3ACFC4BA@outgoing.verizon.net> <20040111035924.GC3393@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oh thank you Dan. That's what I needed to know. My guess part of the little information is because of few problems with mhash. I'm new with FreeBSD with a box here, but my public server is run by an old BSD hacker who is very busy and extremely cautious. But he has not used mhash. He makes me research everything new before addling it. Mhash is required for the new Authorize.net validation scripts using Perl or PHP. You made my day, Russell Dickson On 1/10/2004 at 9:59 PM Dan Nelson wrote: >I'm wondering about mhash and how others find it for efficiency on a >> web server, specifically for RAM and how much it adds to the web >> daemon. Also, if anyone has found a problem when recompiling it in >> with PHP? I can't find any such stats and little else on mhash. > >>From what I can tell by the port description, it's just a library, and >it seems to duplicate functionality already in openssl's libcrypto >library. I wouldn't expect it to add more than a couple KB to any >program linked with it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401102334450596.3BE9BC53>