Date: 16 Jun 1999 15:27:48 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, dan.langille@dvl-software.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org> Subject: Re: named timeouts Message-ID: <xzpbtegcm23.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Wed, 16 Jun 1999 14:53:06 %2B0200" References: <10509.929537586@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <xzpyahkcq9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > > Actually it doesnt, it means that the client closed his socket before > > > named got to answer... > > Doh! I inverted 'to' and 'from' in my head. Am I the only one to > > expect 'from' to come before 'to'? > AHA!!! You never owned a HP calculator! Clearly a math weenie with > a TI style "just type it as it is written" attitude :-) Wrong :) I have an HP20S and an HP48G. I had a TI53 a long time ago, though. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbtegcm23.fsf>