From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Jan 12 12: 4:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.243.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1E914E1F for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:04:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA47744; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:03:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:03:54 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200001122003.VAA47744@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DUAL-brand ELF binaries X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-emulation In-Reply-To: <85im4l$1a9b$1@atlantis.rz.tu-clausthal.de> User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.4-19991219-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Vladimir B. Grebeschikov wrote in list.freebsd-emulation: > Ok, I am understand it, but may be is the way to "mark" syscalls > on point of syscall ? (while building libraries with syscalls) > and use one, extended table of syscalls ? If you have the source code of the libraries (which is necessary to "build" them), then why don't you simply compile them for the same platform the binary is for? Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany (Info: finger userinfo:olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) "In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt" (Terry Pratchett) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message