From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 30 14:19:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA09786 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 14:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from mail.san.rr.com (ns.san.rr.com [204.210.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA09765 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 14:19:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (dt051n19.san.rr.com [204.210.32.25]) by mail.san.rr.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA11640; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 14:19:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3481E63F.B3250EE4@dal.net> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 14:18:39 -0800 From: Studded X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-11-30-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Question/suggestion re pine port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Greetings, :) According to the Makefile, ports@ is the maintainer for the pine port, so I have a question and a suggestion. First off, I'm curious as to why the patches we supply build -g versions of the binaries. Not a big deal, just wondering. :) I also have a suggestion regarding installing the default version of the pine.conf file. At minimum something like this in the pine/files/Makefile would be useful I think: /usr/local/bin/pine -conf > /usr/local/share/doc/pine/pine.conf You might also consider cp'ing that file to /usr/local/etc if there is not currently a pine.conf there, or maybe even copy /usr/local/etc/pine.conf to /usr/local/etc/pine.conf.old? Hope this helps, Doug