Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:52:03 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Cc: 'Kris Kennaway' <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fping-2.4b2 is in IPv6 ports but doesn't have an IPv6 binary... Message-ID: <20021027005203.GA16148@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <000801c27cf8$37fb39a0$420d640a@unfix.org> References: <20021026034536.GB92923@xor.obsecurity.org> <000801c27cf8$37fb39a0$420d640a@unfix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > Eh? Why do you think there should be a separate binary for IPv6 and > > IPv4? >=20 > Well because I made the patch for fping which makes it IPv6 capable ? :) > So I am quite sure of it it makes too, check: Okay, thanks for clarifying. I notice the port contains this: =2Eif defined(WITH_IPV6) # IPv6 not enabled by default, as it does not work together with IPv4. CFLAGS+=3D -DIPV6 =2Eendif Kris --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9uzizWry0BWjoQKURAh1UAJ9vdPpR9BMnY2AJvOLuzM40cbz/tgCg3i5r oxaazVUEqyGHEe0LZRoYQU4= =2VVM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021027005203.GA16148>