Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 16:47:14 +0300 From: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> To: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Timo_V=C3=B6lker?= <timo.voelker@fh-muenster.de>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unable to UEFI boot 11.2 via pxeboot Message-ID: <92E673FE-FF42-41F3-8610-CCB960805A34@me.com> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaFb3gdgF-OsNt1wEL6gCu3VLvYnuh0bouncGccE3sMK8A@mail.gmail.com> References: <E08238AB-5405-42D6-9475-53415F20C976@fh-muenster.de> <3DF39C46-977E-4D07-AF23-F0C7D5DAF2E6@fh-muenster.de> <9A67D337-ADC9-4B19-A44D-6C08135861D3@me.com> <A0CD2280-7E61-456E-B197-792F37C4C546@me.com> <CACNAnaFb3gdgF-OsNt1wEL6gCu3VLvYnuh0bouncGccE3sMK8A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 2 Aug 2018, at 16:42, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> wrote: >>> On 2 Aug 2018, at 15:32, Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On 2 Aug 2018, at 15:08, Timo V=C3=B6lker = <timo.voelker@fh-muenster.de <mailto:timo.voelker@fh-muenster.de>> = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> It seems this issue is related to current as well. I did a quick = test and got this output, while I tried to (pxe)boot FreeBSD current = (without a USB stick plugged in) >>>>=20 >>>> https://ibb.co/no8Fve <https://ibb.co/no8Fve>; >>>>=20 >>>> Best regards >>>>=20 >>>> Timo >>>=20 >>> the hint is about efipart_inithandles() returning 2, thats errno = code for ENOENT. congratz, you have hit the corner case:D >>>=20 >>> Since efinet_dev is part of devsw, we can not skip the devswitch = init with such error, we still need to walk the list. Let me see if I = can provide quick fix. >>>=20 >>> rgds, >>> toomas >>>=20 >>=20 >> Could you check the current with = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337131 = <https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337131>; >>=20 >> thanks, >> toomas >>=20 >=20 > Hmm... that's less than great. Is this worth an MFC + 11.2 EN? I'd > suspect it's not an entirely common case at all, but loader.efi is > highly visible and actually updated in stable/11 (vs. soon-to-be > thrown on ESP in head. >=20 >=20 Once the fix is confirmed, I think it is worth MFC (I haven't checked 11 = source, however). I just want to be sure the provided patch will provide = complete fix. rgds, toomas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92E673FE-FF42-41F3-8610-CCB960805A34>