From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 18 10:13:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br (perninha.conectiva.com.br [200.250.58.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E57F37B423 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:13:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from riel@conectiva.com.br) Received: from burns.conectiva (burns.conectiva [10.0.0.4]) by perninha.conectiva.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 27D9516B1A for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:13:00 -0300 (EST) Received: (qmail 3145 invoked by uid 0); 18 Apr 2001 17:12:59 -0000 Received: from duckman.distro.conectiva (root@10.0.17.2) by burns.conectiva with SMTP; 18 Apr 2001 17:12:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (riel@localhost) by duckman.distro.conectiva (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3IHCxe18216 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:12:59 -0300 X-Authentication-Warning: duckman.distro.conectiva: riel owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:12:59 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Subject: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, better back out SMPng real fast, otherwise you'll get into a flamewar with Dennis again ;) Rik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:08:22 -0400 From: Dennis To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: SMP in 2.4 Does 2.4 have something similar to spl levels or does it still require the ridiculous MS-DOSish spin-locks to protect every bit of code? DB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message