Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:27:41 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: poudirere behave-alike for
Message-ID:  <20131126082740.GF19582@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131125021559.1af33188@dijkstra.cruwe.de>
References:  <20131125021559.1af33188@dijkstra.cruwe.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:15:59AM +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> I think my question is slightly off-topic, but I think freebsd-ports@
> may be the best of many not so good fits:
>=20
> I need to build packages for Solaris and SmartOS. My first choice
> would be ports, which unfortunately are not very well suited to
> cross-building. Instead I use, as many people, pkgsrc.
>=20
> I would like to leverage pkgsrc with something like poudriere,
> especially as I have ZFS and zones in Solaris/SmartOS. I found in a
> message on the DragonFlyBSD list
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2013-01/msg00008.html
> a mention of poudriere being used on DragonFly/pkgsrc.
>=20
> Does anybody know of the state of this piece of software? The git
> repos I can find on google are stale links. As etoilebsd is
> referenced in the mail from DragonFly, I chose to ask here first.
>=20
> To all of you, have a nice week, cheers,

As the creator of poudriere I would be more that happy to see poudriere por=
ted
to Solaris-based os, on the paper it shouldn't be that hard: you have zfs
already zones that can probably be used the way we use the jails right now =
or
you can fallback on chroot like dragonfly does, you have tmpfs etc. That's =
on
the paper.

porting on pkgsrc would also be nice, I have been contacted by a couple of
pkgsrc developper but so far nothing came out.

Just keep in mind, that the main target will always remain FreeBSD but I can
offer a dedicated branch and tell you that there will be convergence. That =
is
how we do now with dragonfly.

regards,
Bapt

--FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlKUW3wACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwJBACbBGGLZSHV78symqAxFLKO7obR
OBQAoIDCtvZSWD4Tfxgje0tiLLie+PPA
=pkFF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131126082740.GF19582>