From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 21 6:30:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.dti.ne.jp (smtp.dti.ne.jp [210.170.128.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568C91516D for ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 06:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shigio@tamacom.com) Received: from choota.signet.or.jp (PPP65.tama-ap5.dti.ne.jp [210.170.192.83]) by smtp.dti.ne.jp (8.9.0/3.7W) with ESMTP id WAA07171; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 22:29:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from choota.signet.or.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by choota.signet.or.jp (8.8.8/) with ESMTP id WAA00904; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 22:27:17 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199909211327.WAA00904@tamacom.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: shigio@tamacom.com Subject: Re: GNU GLOBAL Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 22:27:17 +0900 From: Shigio Yamaguchi Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mats Lofkvist wrote: > But bugfixes and/or developments needed by the core FreeBSD tools > will have to be done on the BSD licensed version of global > (since the core system isn't supposed to depend on ports), > isn't this going to lead to the split of the global development > in two? You are right. But I believe if I make improvements on GNU/GLOBAL then people will replace BSD/GLOBAL with it. It depends on my developping power. Of course, I'll keep fixing bugs about BSD/GLOBAL. -- Shigio Yamaguchi - Tama Communications Corporation Mail: shigio@tamacom.com, WWW: http://www.tamacom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message