From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 28 18:27:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63536150F7; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 18:27:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA35600; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 18:27:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199912290227.SAA35600@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Donn Miller , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc compile error In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Dec 1999 18:18:34 PST." <10305.946433914@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 18:27:09 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I can rightfully claim that you cannot build XFree86 3.9 xxx dated December 24 with the default gcc compiler on FreeBSD -current. I am running FreeBSD -current and XFree86 3.9xxx current. > > Thats nice . Now we have a compiler which fails to build X. > > This seems like hyperbole. I'm able to build X just fine with the > -current compiler, so to directly imply that we can't do so flies in > the face of common sense and experience. > > - Jordan -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message