Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:58:11 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: suggestion for camcontrol Message-ID: <20000917145811.A20608@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009171303450.96334-100000@beppo.feral.com>; from mjacob@feral.com on Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 01:04:43PM -0700 References: <20000908161550.A21933@panzer.kdm.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009171303450.96334-100000@beppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 13:04:43 -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > You should be able to do XPT_PATH_INQ for paths 0 through 0xff to get at the > > > list of SIMs. > > > > Actually, you can't do that at the moment. To do a path inquiry, you need > > a device to do a path inquiry on. (i.e. path inquiries can only be done > > via the pass driver at the moment, they aren't supported through the xpt > > driver.) > > Any reason we can't do this through the xpt driver? I'll do it if no > objection. This would make some code I have for DUh identical in FreeBSD. I think it's fine to add a way to do it via the xpt driver. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000917145811.A20608>