From owner-freebsd-fs Mon Nov 30 09:14:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA16301 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:14:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16290 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:14:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA07749; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 18:13:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id SAA12886; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 18:13:03 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19981130181303.Q9226@follo.net> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 18:13:03 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: "Alton, Matthew" , "'Farshidoo'" Cc: FreeBSD-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is LFS operational? References: <31B3F0BF1C40D11192A700805FD48BF9017766BD@STLABCEXG011> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <31B3F0BF1C40D11192A700805FD48BF9017766BD@STLABCEXG011>; from Alton, Matthew on Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 04:03:50PM -0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 04:03:50PM -0000, Alton, Matthew wrote: > Well, I'm not going to win this year's Richard Stallman think-alike > contest. I actually don't mind the notion of my code being used by Sun > or HP or even IBM in a closed product. > > It's just that the thought of my code being assimilated into a binary-only > Redmond/Borg broken kludge makes me want to hurl chow (regurgitate). May I suggest you use the NPL (not MPL) instead of GPL, then? It allow you to change your mind at a later point in time, and do other trade-offs that are in favour of the best use of your software. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message