From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  2 18:20:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id D0B9D106566C; Sun,  2 Sep 2012 18:20:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:20:50 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alberto Villa <avilla@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120902182050.GH10884@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201208312252.q7VMqj07007701@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20120901040818.GA37499@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAJp7RHb_FJB6QgjODYp02NbCubc5Gu1R0poNVi-aJzfA7wAHaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120902171159.GB10884@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAJp7RHYFan9kVtPHdLKKowOMkCf7cXdq7HFQMD4=VZC7uxgi-g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJp7RHYFan9kVtPHdLKKowOMkCf7cXdq7HFQMD4=VZC7uxgi-g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r303449 - head/Mk
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
	<svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>, 
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:20:50 -0000

On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:38:18PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote:
> Sounds good enough to me. I think that, as long as we manage to keep
> descriptions consistent, some small variations are acceptable. I think
> that a draft policy should be written, though, otherwise this whole
> effort can turn into a real mess.

Agreed on the policy part.  As for the mess, I deliberately postponed my
initial desire to fix all those badly worded entries to the point when most
popular knobs will land into.  I will be keeping an eye from now on to
ensure that this file stays more or less perfect (with help of other caring
people of course), and assuming that adding rate would be relatively low at
this point, I do not think it would be particularly hard.

./danfe