From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 00:09:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2043716A4CF for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane.co.uk [62.140.220.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DBA43D31 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.2/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0E09XPv014009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:33 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from localhost (jhary@localhost) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.2/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j0E09W0e014006; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:33 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Vince Hoffman To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <41E6A4F6.2020202@mac.com> Message-ID: <20050113230919.U11552@unsane.co.uk> References: <41E63E33.5010506@locolomo.org> <41E6A4F6.2020202@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: dhcpd for ipv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:36 -0000 On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Erik Norgaard wrote: >> kame dhcpd does not support address allocation and isc-dhcpd does not >> support ipv6 - despite ipv6 being defined in 1996. This makes running an >> ipv6 based local network cumbersome to manage. > > You're absolutely right. > >> Does anyone know of alternatives? I'm confused, I have a /64 from the hurricane electric tunnelbroker. I use rtadvd on the server that is the tunnel endpoint, advertise the /64 using rtadvd and use rtsold or XPs equivelent so any address's are the prefix then the mac address of the client machine (am using rtsold on netbsd and windows XP's ipv6 both of which work fine) so it seems pretty easy to manage a single subnet lan. to me Vince > > Certainly: use IPv4. ISC's dhcpd does just fine with classic IPv4 addresses. > > -- > -Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >