Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 12:35:58 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sup/ctm with Solaris 2.4? Message-ID: <199512131935.MAA11626@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199512131709.SAA14468@caramba.cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <199512131540.QAA09159@caramba.cs.tu-berlin.de> <199512131627.IAA28759@freefall.freebsd.org> <199512131709.SAA14468@caramba.cs.tu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >>Does sup or ctm work with Solaris 2.4? > >If you port it it does. :) > > $ uname -a > SunOS caramba 5.4 Generic_101945-34 sun4m sparc > > $ ./sup wosch > SUP 9.26 (4.3 BSD) for file wosch at Dec 13 17:59:44 > SUP: supfilesrv/tcp: unknown service: using port 871 > SUP Upgrade of src-sys-current at Wed Dec 13 17:59:45 1995 > SUP Fileserver supports compression. > > SUP: Invalid message count -2 > SUP: Error reading file list from file server > SUP: Upgrade of src-sys-current aborted at Dec 13 18:02:38 1995 > Segmentation Fault (core dumped) > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > Tfree (t=0xb028) at stree.c:74 > (gdb) p *t > Cannot access memory at address 0xb028. Hmm, I cheated here and got the original sources from CMU which don't contain the FreeBSD additions, but here you go. fly:/usr3/nate/tmp/sup % sup -v test SUP 7.26 (4.3 BSD) for file test at Dec 13 12:33:44 SUP Upgrade of ports-base-current at Wed Dec 13 12:33:46 1995 SUP Fileserver 8.13 (4.3 BSD) 1094 on insecurity.shockwave.com at 12:33:46 SUP Requesting changes since Dec 31 17:00:00 1969 SUP Receiving file INDEX SUP Receiving file LEGAL SUP Receiving file Makefile SUP Receiving file README SUP Upgrade of ports-base-current completed at Dec 13 12:34:00 1995 SUP Created directory sup/ports-base for sup/ports-base/when.current fly:/usr3/nate/tmp/sup % uname -a SunOS fly 5.4 Generic_101945-10 sun4m sparc I'll try to bring in the FreeBSD changes and see if things go belly up. Note, this was a 'quick and dirty' port, and isn't ready as a patch in the ports tree since I was trying to see if it would work, not make it 'pretty' or correct. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512131935.MAA11626>