From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Feb 8 11:16:01 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14165 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 11:16:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from st-lcremean.tidalwave.net (st-lcremean.tidalwave.net [208.213.203.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14134 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 11:15:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lee@st-lcremean.tidalwave.net) Received: (from lee@localhost) by st-lcremean.tidalwave.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) id OAA02696; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 14:10:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lee) Message-ID: <19990208141042.A2652@tidalwave.net> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 14:10:42 -0500 From: Lee Cremeans To: Brett Glass , "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Licia , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GPL *again* (was: New CODA release) Reply-To: lcremean@tidalwave.net References: <2620.918495440@zippy.cdrom.com> <4.1.19990208113442.00c08cd0@mail.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990208113442.00c08cd0@mail.lariat.org>; from Brett Glass on Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 11:37:01AM -0700 X-OS: FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 11:37:01AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote: > At 09:37 AM 2/8/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I see your point about the language. Still I strongly believe that, > if we do not place a "poison pill" against the GPL in our licenses, > we will see the GPL subsume all else. If you were to add something > that would prevent open source code from being relicensed under > the GPL, how would you phrase it? > Brett, you're missing the point yet again. The BSD license as we see it is free to _all_ comers, no matter what bent they may be -- GPL, proprietary, even (*shudder*) Microsoft. Putting a "poison pill" in the license would make it just as distasteful to the champions of free software as the GPL is to corporations. Like Jordan said, this is one of the great things about the license we have now; it doesn't assume that one group of users is inherently "evil". That said, if you're so concerned about it, you could always write your own license, as has been suggested many times already. Mark our words, though -- _any_ license that prohibits changing its terms is bad news in the long run. -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Lee Cremeans -- Manassas, VA, USA (WakkyMouse on DALnet and WTnet)| | lcremean@tidalwave.net| http://st-lcremean.tidalwave.net/~lee | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message