From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 20:51:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FB51065673; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B803F8FC0A; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id A15FF7300A; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:11:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:11:07 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: <20120830211107.GB97191@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <1865271844.20120829131610@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw, "ip|all" proto and PPPoE -- does PPPoE packets passed to ipfw? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:51:54 -0000 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:01:50AM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > ip from any to any in recv vr0 > > "any" here is also not appropriate... it is just sintactic sugar, "from any to any" corresponds is just printed by default to make the rule look like the 'old style' (pre-2003) ipfw syntax, but otherwise has zero cost at runtime. cheers luigi > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"