From owner-freebsd-doc Tue May 21 17:01:12 1996 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA16145 for doc-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay-2.mail.demon.net (disperse.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.77]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA16135 for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 17:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-2.mail.demon.net id ar02276; 22 May 96 0:58 +0100 Received: from jraynard.demon.co.uk ([158.152.42.77]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net id aa16208; 22 May 96 0:45 +0100 Received: (from fdocs@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.7.5/8.6.12) id TAA18940; Tue, 21 May 1996 19:10:02 GMT Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 19:10:02 GMT From: James Raynard Message-Id: <199605211910.TAA18940@jraynard.demon.co.uk> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <6374.832651510@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Corrections to Linux Emulation Docs Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > as rc.i386 is no longer in /etc. Perhaps this is why some people have > > not been able to get it to work! 8-) > >How now? From a -current /etc/rc file: > ># configure implementation specific stuff >arch=`uname -m` >if [ -f /etc/rc.${arch} ]; then > . /etc/rc.${arch} >fi > > Looks like it's still in /etc to me! More to the point, if anyone > suggested going to /etc/etc.i386/rc.i386, we'd all chop their heads > off. It's /etc/rc.i386 for the forseeable future. That's what I thought, but that's not what's in the CVS tree that I checked out on Sunday night:- $ ls ~cvs/src/etc/rc.i386* ls: /usr/local/cvs/src/etc/rc.i386*: No such file or directory $ ls ~cvs/src/etc/etc.i386/rc.i386* /usr/local/cvs/src/etc/etc.i386/rc.i386,v I've submitted a bug report for /etc/rc on this basis, BTW. > Thanks for the other typo corrections! You're welcome!