From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 17 13:58: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14215584 for ; Mon, 17 May 1999 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA03386; Mon, 17 May 1999 13:57:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 13:57:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Wayne Cuddy Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: 'top' not showing correct output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 15 May 1999, Wayne Cuddy wrote: > When I run the 'top' command on FBSD 3.1R the "CPU states" line and the > WCPU/CPU percentages are incorrect. For some reason they show 0.0% when I > know this simply is not true. I even tested this with a program that looped > using up lots of CPU. This doesn't happen on all of my systems, it only > happens on a Dell Latitude M233ST. Has anyone else seen this before? your 'looping' program is not on the list. Perhaps your program optimized out the loop? > last pid: 295; load averages: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00 up 0+00:11:43 23:05:29 > 30 processes: 1 running, 29 sleeping > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle > Mem: 3740K Active, 7516K Inact, 6348K Wired, 3466K Buf, 12M Free > Swap: 98M Total, 98M Free > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 229 root 2 0 1028K 760K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd1 All quiet on the CPU front... Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message