From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Jun 15 14: 5: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (smtp1.xs4all.nl [194.109.30.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D034155D3 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:04:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from niels@bakker.net) Received: from liquid.tpb.net (arctic.xs4all.nl [194.109.37.82]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA19542 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:04:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by liquid.tpb.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id XAA14440 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:04:54 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:04:54 +0200 (CEST) From: N X-Sender: niels@liquid.tpb.net To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPU states at 0.0% on 3.2-R SMP box ? In-Reply-To: <199906151902.VAA96921@midten.fast.no> Message-ID: <9906152259030.14354-100000@liquid.tpb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: <9906152259032.14354@liquid.tpb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tor.Egge@fast.no wrote: > Some bioses seems to trap direct accesses to the RTC chip in order to > pass Y2K tests (Some Y2K test programs access the RTC chip directly). This looks very familiar to what's on ASUS's web pages re differences between BIOS revisions 1008 and 1009 for the P2B-D and P2B-DS boards. (Drat. Now that I actually go looking for it I can't find any mention of revision 1009 anywhere except on their ftp site.) -- Niels. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message