Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:18:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> Cc: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) Message-ID: <201906191618.x5JGIDWa018900@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <2cd79858-66a6-dedb-19b8-697d220c9986@grosbein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 19.06.2019 3:57, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > And god only knows how much will break once I've done that. > > IPv6 will break only. That is incorrect, scripts that would silently do nothing can now infact fail, trust me, first hand experience. This can have consequences beyong "IPv6 will break only". > > How many other > > people have tested -all- of the resulting binaries, seriously, on actual > > production systems? (I may be the first one ever, at least for 12.0.) > > I ran plenty of hosts with IPv6 disabled this way and no problems observed, but this pre-dates 12.0. I've not run a userland without V6 in a long time once I started to have issues with some things. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201906191618.x5JGIDWa018900>