From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jun 11 5:44:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26DB37B408; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 98B6F5362; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:44:25 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Peter Edwards Cc: Juli Mallett , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for comments on a new utility... References: <20020611051517.A87966@FreeBSD.ORG> <3D05EFA8.6070805@openet-telecom.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Jun 2002 14:44:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3D05EFA8.6070805@openet-telecom.com> Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Edwards writes: > Isn't the kvm_*() interface somewhat frowned upon? Is there anything > missing from /proc that you need kvm_* for? /proc is also frowned upon, use sysctl. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message