From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sat Mar 4 01:10:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603F6CF670A; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 01:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2425B1FEE; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 01:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id v241AY4E073651; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:10:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id v241AYnh073650; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:10:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201703040110.v241AYnh073650@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r314585 - head/usr.sbin/syslogd In-Reply-To: To: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:10:34 -0800 (PST) CC: Hiroki Sato , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers , ngie@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 01:10:36 -0000 [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > > > On Mar 3, 2017, at 15:14, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: > > ? > > > Actually, accepts is better. Although it isn?t clear by itself, the sentence fragment is describing the -a option, which is singular, not plural. Here?s the sentence in full context: > > > > source packet must belong to. A > > service of `*' accepts UDP > > packets from any source port. > > Correction: it?s describing `service`, which is still singular. > -Ngie Tongue in cheek: Now my head hurts!!! I let this stir around in my grey space for a minute and went wait, adding (s) to accept does not make it plurar. This is one of those really screwed up situations that is just a mess. So I had to google. AmE would like us to use just accept in this specific case. BrE would rather see accepts. It has to do with some thing they call present subjunctive. If you want to make your head hurt too google up "accept or accepts" -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org