From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 16:17:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C014106567E for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtai102.cox.net (eastrmmtai102.cox.net [68.230.240.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9636A8FC20 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080820160328.KKOI22820.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:03:28 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id 4g3U1a00J4iy4EG02g3V1X; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:03:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:03:36 -0500 To: "Hans Petter Selasky" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080819194413.GB16977@elvis.mu.org> <48AB32D4.5040904@FreeBSD.org> <200808192257.13576.hselasky@c2i.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200808192257.13576.hselasky@c2i.net> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.51 (Linux) Cc: usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP new usb code coming in. X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:17:48 -0000 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:57:11 -0500, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name? >> > A. No. This is for a short period, stop being so annoying. >> >> Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding violating >> POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with USB 2.0. >> > > Else you get symbol collisions with the old USB stack ... At least, can you document it? Like add an explain about that usb2 is just a name, not USB 2.0, that way no users can mistake it for USB 2.0. Even smarter people can mistake it for USB 2.0, btw. Cheers, Mezz > --HPS -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org